Last week we discussed the ethical implications of WPP’s acquisition of 24/7 Real Media. Can a marketing services holding company maintain it’s integrity if it has interest in both the buy AND sell side of a media buy? Brands contract media agencies to represent their best interest right?
Microsoft’s purchase of aQuantive raises similar questions: how will Microsoft maintain the relative autonomy of media agency Avenue A Razorfish? According to Joe Doran, EVP of Microsoft Digital Advertising Solutions:
Joe Doran: We do know people could say there’s a conflict of interest between us. We want to make sure all ad agencies understand we don’t want that to become a reality. We’ll operate Avenue A/Razorfish at arms length, make sure they have ability to drive the value for marketers and advertisers and remain independent.
Hmm. Should we take their word for it? Will WPP take the same approach?
Don’t marketers hire agencies to make the best and most unbiased use of their media spend? Will that be possible if a brand’s agency is owned by a company who would like to spend as much of your budget on their services as possible? This is a very interesting turn for the Advertising & Media business and we’ll continue to watch it unfold.
Related Links:
[tags] wpp, 24/7 real media, microsoft, aquantive, avenue a razorfish, media agencies, marketing.fm, marketing blogs, ethics [/tags]



